na dadarÅ›a praticchannaá¹
valmīka-tṛṇa-kīcakaiḥ
pipÄ«likÄbhir ÄcÄ«rṇaá¹
medas-tvaá¹…-mÄá¹sa-Å›oṇitam
tapantaá¹ tapasÄ lokÄn
yathÄbhrÄpihitaá¹ ravim
vilaká¹£ya vismitaḥ prÄha
hasaá¹s taá¹ haá¹sa-vÄhanaḥ
na - not; dadarÅ›a - saw; praticchannam - covered; valmÄ«ka - by an anthill; tṛṇa - grass; kÄ«cakaiḥ - and bamboo sticks; pipÄ«likÄbhiḥ - by the ants; ÄcÄ«rṇam - eaten all around; medaḥ - whose fat; tvak - skin; mÄá¹sa - the flesh; Å›oṇitam - and blood; tapantam - heating; tapasÄ - by a severe type of penance; lokÄn - all the three worlds; yathÄ - just as; abhra - by clouds; apihitam - covered; ravim - the sun; vilaká¹£ya - seeing; vismitaḥ - struck with wonder; prÄha - said; hasan - smiling; tam - to him; haá¹sa-vÄhanaḥ - Lord BrahmÄ, who rides a swan airplane.
The living entity can live merely by his own power, without the help of skin, marrow, bone, blood and so on, because it is said, asaá¹…go hy ayaá¹ puruá¹£aḥ — the living entity has nothing to do with the material covering. HiraṇyakaÅ›ipu performed a severe type of tapasya, austerity, for many long years. Indeed, it is said that he performed the tapasya for one hundred heavenly years. Since one day of the demigods equals six of our months, certainly this was a very long time. By nature’s own way, his body had been almost consumed by earthworms, ants and other parasites, and therefore even BrahmÄ was at first unable to see him. Later, however, BrahmÄ could ascertain where HiraṇyakaÅ›ipu was, and BrahmÄ was struck with wonder to see HiraṇyakaÅ›ipu’s extraordinary power to execute tapasya. Anyone would conclude that HiraṇyakaÅ›ipu was dead because his body was covered in so many ways, but Lord BrahmÄ, the supreme living being in this universe, could understand that HiraṇyakaÅ›ipu was alive but covered by material elements.
It is also to be noted that although HiraṇyakaÅ›ipu performed this austerity for a long, long time, he was nonetheless known as a Daitya and RÄká¹£asa. It will be seen from verses to follow that even great saintly persons could not perform such a severe type of austerity. Why then was he called a RÄká¹£asa and Daitya? It is because whatever he did was for his own sense gratification. His son PrahlÄda MahÄrÄja was only five years old, and so what could PrahlÄda do? Yet simply by performing a little devotional service according to the instructions of NÄrada Muni, PrahlÄda became so dear to the Lord that the Lord came to save him, whereas HiraṇyakaÅ›ipu, in spite of all his austerities, was killed. This is the difference between devotional service and all other methods of perfection. One who performs severe austerities for sense gratification is fearful to the entire world, whereas a devotee who performs even a slight amount of devotional service is a friend to everyone (suhá¹›daá¹ sarva-bhÅ«tÄnÄm). Since the Lord is the well-wisher of every living entity and since a devotee assumes the qualities of the Lord, a devotee also acts for everyone’s good fortune by performing devotional service. Thus although HiraṇyakaÅ›ipu performed such a severe austerity, he remained a Daitya and a RÄká¹£asa, whereas PrahlÄda MahÄrÄja, although born of the same Daitya father, became the most exalted devotee and was personally protected by the Supreme Lord. Bhakti is therefore called sarvopÄdhi-vinirmuktam, indicating that a devotee is freed from all material designations, and anyÄbhilÄá¹£itÄ-śūnyam, situated in a transcendental position, free from all material desires.