yo 'smabhyaṠsampratiśrutya
kanyÄ-ratnaá¹ vigarhya naḥ
kṛṣṇÄyÄdÄn na satrÄjit
kasmÄd bhrÄtaram anviyÄt

 yaḥ - who; asmabhyam - to each of us; sampratiÅ›rutya - promising; kanyÄ - his daughter; ratnam - jewellike; vigarhya - contemptuously neglecting; naḥ - us; kṛṣṇÄya - to Kṛṣṇa; adÄt - gave; na - not; satrÄjit - SatrÄjit; kasmÄt - why; bhrÄtaram - his brother; anviyÄt - should follow (in death).


Text

“SatrÄjit promised his jewellike daughter to us but then gave her to Kṛṣṇa instead, contemptuously neglecting us. So why should SatrÄjit not follow his brother’s path?â€

Purport

Since SatrÄjit’s brother, Prasena, had been violently killed, the implication of “following his brother’s path†is obvious. What we have here is an assassination plot.

It is well known that both AkrÅ«ra and Ká¹›tavarmÄ are exalted, pure devotees of the Supreme Lord, so their unusual behavior requires some explanation. The ÄcÄryas provide it as follows: ÅšrÄ«la JÄ«va GosvÄmÄ« states that AkrÅ«ra, although a first-class, pure devotee of the Lord, was a victim of the anger directed against him by the residents of Gokula because he took Lord Kṛṣṇa away from Vá¹›ndÄvana. The gosvÄmÄ« further states that Ká¹›tavarmÄ had associated with Kaá¹sa — both of them being members of the Bhoja dynasty — and thus Ká¹›tavarmÄ was now suffering from this undesirable association.

ÅšrÄ«la ViÅ›vanÄtha CakravartÄ« offers an alternative explanation: Both AkrÅ«ra and Ká¹›tavarmÄ were furious with SatrÄjit because he had insulted Lord Kṛṣṇa and spread false rumors about Him in DvÄrakÄ. Under normal circumstances AkrÅ«ra and Ká¹›tavarmÄ would have been most pleased that Lord Kṛṣṇa married the beautiful SatyabhÄmÄ. Being pure devotees, they could not actually be unhappy about this match, nor could they become jealous rivals of the Lord. Therefore they had an ulterior motive in behaving like His rivals.