asty evam evam
asti - it is; evam evam - like each of these.
The definitions of bhakti given above—by ÅšrÄ«la VyÄsadeva, Garga Muni, ÅšÄṇá¸ilya, and NÄrada Muni—are not in conflict. While NÄrada has given us his own definition, here he says that the others are also valid. Bhakti is in fact a universal principle present at least partially in all theistic religions. Indeed, within many religions one could find a definition of love of God that would not contradict the conclusions of NÄrada Muni and the principles of Kṛṣṇa consciousness taught by the followers of Lord Caitanya.
NÄrada has defined the highest form of bhakti. But is such a perfect state possible? The answer is yes. Unless devotees from time to time manifest pure bhakti, aspirants on the spiritual path would have nothing to emulate and strive for, and they might conclude that parama-bhakti is only an imaginary ideal. As Lord Caitanya says, dharma-sthÄpana-hetu sÄdhura vyavahÄra: "A devotee's behavior establishes the true purpose of religious principles" (Cc. Madhya 17.185).
Once SanÄtana GosvÄmÄ« pretended to be devoted to a sannyÄsÄ« named Mukunda SarasvatÄ«, rather than to Lord Caitanya. When Lord Caitanya's intimate servant JagadÄnanda Paṇá¸ita saw SanÄtana's behavior, he became very angry and threatened to beat SanÄtana. SanÄtana then revealed his purpose: "My dear JagadÄnanda Paṇá¸ita, you are a greatly learned saint. No one is dearer to ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu than you. This faith in Lord Caitanya befits you quite well. Unless you demonstrate it, how could I learn such faith?" (Cc. Antya 13.59).
We have seen the example of complete self-surrender and dedication of one's activities to Kṛṣṇa in the life of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami PrabhupÄda. ÅšrÄ«la PrabhupÄda's sanctity was not a private affair: he gave of himself profusely and was empowered to bring thousands of people to Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Thus he perfectly fulfilled the criterion given by ÅšrÄ«la Bhaktivinoda ṬhÄkura—that one can tell the quality of a Vaiṣṇava by how many persons he convinces to become Vaiṣṇavas. By his personal preaching, by his books, and by the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement he created and nurtured, ÅšrÄ«la PrabhupÄda showed the example of a life dedicated purely to pleasing Kṛṣṇa. The potency of his acts continues as an ongoing legacy, accessible to anyone interested in taking up the path of bhakti-yoga. We are assured, therefore, of finding examples of perfect bhakti in the past, at present, and in the future.
Here NÄrada states that each authority he has quoted has described bhakti in his own authentic way. But in the next sÅ«tra NÄrada will say that the gopÄ«s of Vraja are exemplars of bhakti. Of the brief definitions of bhakti given in SÅ«tras 16 through 19, we find that NÄrada's own definition best fits the gopÄ«s: "Bhakti consists of offering one's every act to the Supreme Lord and feeling extreme distress in forgetting Him."