yadyadi brahmaṇya kare brÄhmaṇera sahÄya
'Å›uddha-vaiṣṇava' nahe, haye 'vaiṣṇavera prÄya'

 yadyapi - although; brahmaṇya kare - give charity to the brÄhmaṇas; brÄhmaṇera sahÄya - great helpers to the brÄhmaṇas; Å›uddha-vaiṣṇava - pure Vaiṣṇavas; nahe - not; haye - they are; vaiṣṇavera prÄya - almost like Vaiṣṇavas.


Text

“Although your father and uncle are charitable to brÄhmaṇas and greatly help them, they are nevertheless not pure Vaiṣṇavas. However, they are almost like Vaiṣṇavas.

Purport

As stated by ÅšrÄ«la Bhaktivinoda ṬhÄkura in his Amá¹›ta-pravÄha-bhÄá¹£ya, some people, usually very rich men, dress like Vaiṣṇavas and give charity to brÄhmaṇas. They are also attached to Deity worship, but because of their attachment to material enjoyment, they cannot be pure Vaiṣṇavas. AnyÄbhilÄá¹£itÄ-śūnyaá¹ jñÄna-karmÄdy-anÄvá¹›tam. The pure Vaiṣṇava has no desire for material enjoyment. That is the basic qualification of a pure Vaiṣṇava. There are men, especially rich men, who regularly worship the Deity, give charity to brÄhmaṇas and are pious in every respect, but they cannot be pure Vaiṣṇavas. Despite their outward show of Vaiṣṇavism and charity, their inner desire is to enjoy a higher standard of material life. RaghunÄtha dÄsa’s father, Govardhana, and uncle, Hiraṇya dÄsa, were both very charitable to brÄhmaṇas. Indeed, the brÄhmaṇas from the Gauá¸Ä«ya district were practically dependent upon them. Thus they were accepted as very pious gentlemen. However, they presented themselves as Vaiṣṇavas to the eyes of people in general, although from a purely spiritual point of view they were ordinary human beings, not pure Vaiṣṇavas. Actual Vaiṣṇavas considered them almost Vaiṣṇavas, not pure Vaiṣṇavas. In other words, they were kaniṣṭha-adhikÄrÄ«s, for they were ignorant of higher Vaiṣṇava regulative principles. Nevertheless, they could not be called viá¹£ayÄ«s, or blind materialistic enjoyers.