maitreya uvÄca
sanakÄdyÄ nÄradaÅ› ca
á¹›bhur haá¹so 'ruṇir yatiḥ
naite gá¹›hÄn brahma-sutÄ
hy Ävasann Å«rdhva-retasaḥ
maitreyaḥ uvÄca - Maitreya said; sanaka-ÄdyÄḥ - those headed by Sanaka; nÄradaḥ - NÄrada; ca - and; á¹›bhuḥ - Ṛbhu; haá¹saḥ - Haá¹sa; aruṇiḥ - Aruṇi; yatiḥ - Yati; na - not; ete - all these; gá¹›hÄn - at home; brahma-sutÄḥ - sons of BrahmÄ; hi - certainly; Ävasan - did live; Å«rdhva-retasaḥ - unadulterated celibates.
The system of brahmacarya has been current since the birth of BrahmÄ. A section of the population, especially male, did not marry at all. Instead of allowing their semen to be driven downwards, they used to lift the semen up to the brain. They are called Å«rdhva-retasaḥ, those who lift up. Semen is so important that if, by the yogic process, one can lift the semen up to the brain, he can perform wonderful work — one’s memory is enabled to act very swiftly, and the duration of life is increased. YogÄ«s can thus perform all kinds of austerity with steadiness and be elevated to the highest perfectional stage, even to the spiritual world. Vivid examples of brahmacÄrÄ«s who accepted this principle of life are the four sages Sanaka, Sanandana, SanÄtana and Sanat-kumÄra, as well as NÄrada and others.
Another significant phrase here is naite gá¹›hÄn hy Ävasan, “they did not live at home.†Gá¹›ha means “home†as well as “wife.†In fact, “home†means wife; “home†does not mean a room or a house. One who lives with a wife lives at home; otherwise, a sannyÄsÄ« or brahmacÄrÄ«, even though he may live in a room or in a house, does not live at home. That they did not live at home means that they did not accept a wife, and so there was no question of their discharging semen. Semen is meant to be discharged when one has a home, a wife and the intention to beget children; otherwise there is no injunction for discharging semen. These principles were followed from the beginning of creation, and such brahmacÄrÄ«s never created progeny. This narration has dealt with the descendants of Lord BrahmÄ from Manu’s daughter PrasÅ«ti. PrasÅ«ti’s daughter was DÄká¹£Äyaṇī, or SatÄ«, in relation to whom the story of the Daká¹£a yajña was narrated. Maitreya is now explaining about the progeny of the sons of BrahmÄ. Out of the many sons of BrahmÄ, the brahmacÄrÄ« sons headed by Sanaka and NÄrada did not marry at all, and therefore there is no question of narrating the history of their descendants.