ÄbÄdhito 'pi hy ÄbhÄso
yathÄ vastutayÄ smá¹›taḥ
durghaá¹atvÄd aindriyakaá¹
tadvad artha-vikalpitam
ÄbÄdhitaḥ - rejected; api - although; hi - certainly; ÄbhÄsaḥ - a reflection; yathÄ - as; vastutayÄ - a form of reality; smá¹›taḥ - accepted; durghaá¹atvÄt - because of being very difficult to prove the reality; aindriyakam - knowledge derived from the senses; tadvat - similarly; artha - reality; vikalpitam - speculated or doubtful.
The impersonalists try to prove that the varieties in the vision of the empiric philosopher are false. The impersonalist philosophy, vivarta-vÄda, generally cites the acceptance of a rope to be a snake as an example of this fact. According to this example, the varieties within our vision are false, just as a rope seen to be a snake is false. The Vaiṣṇavas say, however, that although the idea that the rope is a snake is false, the snake is not false; one has experience of a snake in reality, and therefore he knows that although the representation of the rope as a snake is false or illusory, there is a snake in reality. Similarly, this world, which is full of varieties, is not false; it is a reflection of the reality in the Vaikuṇá¹ha world, the spiritual world.
The reflection of the sun from a mirror is nothing but light within darkness. Thus although it is not exactly sunlight, without the sunlight the reflection would be impossible. Similarly, the varieties of this world would be impossible unless there were a real prototype in the spiritual world. The MÄyÄvÄdÄ« philosopher cannot understand this, but a real philosopher must be convinced that light is not possible at all without a background of sunlight. Thus the jugglery of words used by the MÄyÄvÄdÄ« philosopher to prove that this material world is false may amaze inexperienced children, but a man with full knowledge knows perfectly well that there cannot be any existence without Kṛṣṇa. Therefore a Vaiṣṇava insists on the platform of somehow or other accepting Kṛṣṇa (tasmÄt kenÄpy upÄyena manaḥ kṛṣṇe niveÅ›ayet).
When we raise our unmixed faith to the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa, everything is revealed. Kṛṣṇa also says in Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ (7.1):
mayy Äsakta-manÄḥ pÄrtha
yogaá¹ yuñjan mad-ÄÅ›rayaḥ
asaá¹Å›ayaá¹ samagraá¹ mÄá¹
yathÄ jñÄsyasi tac chṛṇu
“Now hear, O son of Pá¹›thÄ [Arjuna], how by practicing yoga in full consciousness of Me, with mind attached to Me, you can know Me in full, free from doubt.†Simply by raising one’s staunch faith in Kṛṣṇa and His instructions, one can understand reality without a doubt (asaá¹Å›ayaá¹ samagraá¹ mÄm). One can understand how Kṛṣṇa’s material and spiritual energies are working and how He is present everywhere although everything is not Him. This philosophy of acintya-bhedÄbheda, inconceivable oneness and difference, is the perfect philosophy enunciated by the Vaiṣṇavas. Everything is an emanation from Kṛṣṇa, but it is not that everything must therefore be worshiped. Speculative knowledge cannot give us reality as it is, but will continue to be nefariously imperfect. So-called scientists try to prove that there is no God and that everything is happening because of the laws of nature, but this is imperfect knowledge because nothing can work unless directed by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This is explained in Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ (9.10) by the Lord Himself:
mayÄdhyaká¹£eṇa praká¹›tiḥ
sÅ«yate sacarÄcaram
hetunÄnena kaunteya
jagad viparivartate
“This material nature is working under My direction, O son of KuntÄ«, and it is producing all moving and unmoving beings. By its rule this manifestation is created and annihilated again and again.†In this regard, ÅšrÄ«la MadhvÄcÄrya gives this note: durghaá¹atvÄd arthatvena parameÅ›vareṇaiva kalpitam. The background of everything is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, VÄsudeva. VÄsudevaḥ sarvam iti sa mahÄtmÄ sudurlabhaḥ. This can be understood by a mahÄtmÄ who is perfect in knowledge. Such a mahÄtmÄ is rarely seen.