jyotir-Ädir ivÄbhÄti
saáš ghÄtÄn na vivicyate
vidanty ÄtmÄnam Ätma-sthaáš
mathitvÄ kavayo 'ntataḼ
jyotiḼ - fire; ÄdiḼ - and other elements; iva - just as; ÄbhÄti - appear; saáš ghÄtÄt - from the bodies of demigods and others; na - not; vivicyate - are distinguished; vidanti - perceive; ÄtmÄnam - the Supersoul; Ätma-stham - situated in the heart; mathitvÄ - by discerning; kavayaḼ - expert thinkers; antataḼ - within.
In Bhagavad-gÄŤtÄ (10.41) the Lord says:
yad yad vibhĹŤtimat sattvaáš
ĹrÄŤmad ĹŤrjitam eva vÄ
tat tad evÄvagaccha tvaáš
mama tejo-âášĹa-sambhavam
âKnow that all beautiful, glorious and mighty creations spring from but a spark of My splendor.â We have the practical experience of seeing that one person is able to do very wonderful things whereas another cannot do those same things and cannot even do things that require only a little common sense. Therefore, how much a devotee has been favored by the Supreme Personality of Godhead can be tested by the activities the devotee has performed. In Bhagavad-gÄŤtÄ (10.10) the Lord also says:
teᚣÄáš satata-yuktÄnÄáš
bhajatÄáš prÄŤti-pĹŤrvakam
dadÄmi buddhi-yogaáš taáš
yena mÄm upayÄnti te
âTo those who are constantly devoted and who worship Me with love, I give the understanding by which they can come to Me.â This is very practical. A teacher instructs the student if the student is capable of taking more and more instructions. Otherwise, in spite of being instructed by the teacher, the student cannot make strides in his understanding. This has nothing to do with partiality. When KášášŁáša says teᚣÄáš satata-yuktÄnÄáš bhajatÄáš prÄŤti-pĹŤrvakam/ dadÄmi buddhi-yogaáš tam, this indicates that KášášŁáša is prepared to give bhakti-yoga to everyone, but one must be capable of receiving it. That is the secret. Thus when a person exhibits wonderful devotional activities, a thoughtful man understands that KášášŁáša has been more favorable to this devotee.
This is not difficult to understand, but envious persons do not accept that KášášŁáša has bestowed His favor upon a particular devotee in accordance with his advanced position. Such foolish persons become envious and try to minimize an advanced devoteeâs activities. That is not Vaiᚣášavism. A Vaiᚣášava should appreciate the service rendered to the Lord by other Vaiᚣášavas. Therefore a Vaiᚣášava is described in ĹrÄŤmad-BhÄgavatam as nirmatsara. Vaiᚣášavas are never envious of other Vaiᚣášavas or of anyone else, and therefore they are called nirmatsarÄášÄáš satÄm.
As Bhagavad-gÄŤtÄ informs us, one can understand how one is saturated with sattva-guáša, rajo-guáša or tamo-guáša. In the examples given herewith, fire represents the mode of goodness. One can understand the constitution of a container for wood, petrol or other inflammable substances by the quantity of the fire. Similarly, water represents rajo-guáša, the mode of passion. A small skin and the vast Atlantic Ocean both contain water, and by seeing the quantity of water in a container one can understand the size of the container. The sky represents the mode of ignorance. The sky is present in a small earthen pot and also in outer space. Thus by proper judgment one can see who is a devatÄ, or demigod, and who is an asura, Yakᚣa or RÄkᚣasa according to the quantities of sattva-guáša, rajo-guáša and tamo-guáša. One cannot judge whether a person is a devatÄ, an asura or a RÄkᚣasa by seeing him, but a sane man can understand this by the activities such a person performs. A general description is given in the Padma PurÄáša: viᚣášu-bhaktaḼ smášto daiva Äsuras tad-viparyayaḼ. A devotee of Lord Viᚣášu is a demigod, whereas an asura or Yakᚣa is just the opposite. An asura is not a devotee of Lord Viᚣášu; instead, for his sense gratification he is a devotee of the demigods, bhĹŤtas, pretas and so on. Thus one can judge who is a devatÄ, who is a RÄkᚣasa and who is an asura by how they conduct their activities.
The word ÄtmÄnam in this verse means paramÄtmÄnam. The ParamÄtmÄ, or Supersoul, is situated in the core of everyoneâs heart (antataḼ). This is confirmed in Bhagavad-gÄŤtÄ (18.61). ÄŤĹvaraḼ sarva-bhĹŤtÄnÄáš hášd-deĹe ârjuna tiᚣášhati. The ÄŤĹvara, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, being situated in everyoneâs heart, gives directions to everyone in terms of oneâs capabilities in taking the instructions. The instructions of Bhagavad-gÄŤtÄ are open to everyone, but some people understand them properly, whereas others understand them so improperly that they cannot even believe in the existence of KášášŁáša, although reading KášášŁášaâs book. Although the GÄŤtÄ says ĹrÄŤ-bhagavÄn uvÄca, indicating that KášášŁáša spoke, they cannot understand KášášŁáša. This is due to their misfortune or incapability, which is caused by rajo-guáša and tamo-guáša, the modes of passion and ignorance. It is because of these modes that they cannot even understand KášášŁáša, whereas an advanced devotee like Arjuna understands Him and glorifies Him, saying, paraáš brahma paraáš dhÄma pavitraáš paramaáš bhavÄn: âYou are the Supreme Brahman, the supreme abode and purifier.â KášášŁáša is open to everyone, but one needs the capability to understand Him.
By external features one cannot understand who is favored by KášášŁáša and who is not. According to oneâs attitude, KášášŁáša becomes oneâs direct adviser, or KášášŁáša becomes unknown. This is not KášášŁášaâs partiality; it is His response to oneâs ability to understand Him. According to oneâs receptiveness â whether one be a devatÄ, asura, Yakᚣa or RÄkᚣasa â KášášŁášaâs quality is proportionately exhibited. This proportionate exhibition of KášášŁášaâs power is misunderstood by less intelligent men to be KášášŁášaâs partiality, but actually it is no such thing. KášášŁáša is equal to everyone, and according to oneâs ability to receive the favor of KášášŁáša, one advances in KášášŁáša consciousness. ĹrÄŤla ViĹvanÄtha CakravartÄŤ ᚏhÄkura gives a practical example in this connection. In the sky there are many luminaries. At night, even in darkness, the moon is extremely brilliant and can be directly perceived. The sun is also extremely brilliant. When covered by clouds, however, these luminaries are not distinctly visible. Similarly, the more one advances in sattva-guáša, the more his brilliance is exhibited by devotional service, but the more one is covered by rajo-guáša and tamo-guáša, the less visible his brilliance, for he is covered by these qualities. The visibility of oneâs qualities does not depend on the partiality of the Supreme Personality of Godhead; it is due to various coverings in different proportions. Thus one can understand how far he has advanced in terms of sattva-guáša and how much he is covered by rajo-guáša and tamo-guáša.