naite sureÅ›Ä á¹›á¹£ayo na caite
tvam eva bhÄsīśa bhid-ÄÅ›raye 'pi
sarvaá¹ pá¹›thak tvaá¹ nigamÄt kathaá¹ vadety
uktena vá¹›ttaá¹ prabhuá¹‡Ä balo 'vait
na - not; ete - these boys; sura-īśÄḥ - the best of the demigods; ṛṣayaḥ - great sages; na - not; ca - and; ete - these calves; tvam - You (Kṛṣṇa); eva - alone; bhÄsi - are manifesting; īśa - O supreme controller; bhit-ÄÅ›raye - in the existence of varieties of difference; api - even; sarvam - everything; pá¹›thak - existing; tvam - You (Kṛṣṇa); nigamÄt - briefly; katham - how; vada - please explain; iti - thus; uktena - having been requested (by Baladeva); vá¹›ttam - the situation; prabhuá¹‡Ä - (having been explained) by Lord Kṛṣṇa; balaḥ - Baladeva; avait - understood.
Inquiring from Kṛṣṇa about the actual situation, Lord BalarÄma said, “My dear Kṛṣṇa, in the beginning I thought that all these cows, calves and cowherd boys were either great sages and saintly persons or demigods, but at the present it appears that they are actually Your expansions. They are all You; You Yourself are playing as the calves and cows and boys. What is the mystery of this situation? Where have those other calves and cows and boys gone? And why are You expanding Yourself as the cows, calves and boys? Will You kindly tell Me what is the cause?†At the request of BalarÄma, Kṛṣṇa briefly explained the whole situation: how the calves and boys were stolen by BrahmÄ and how He was concealing the incident by expanding Himself so that people would not know that the original cows, calves and boys were missing. BalarÄma understood, therefore, that this was not mÄyÄ but Kṛṣṇa’s opulence. Kṛṣṇa has all opulences, and this was but another opulence of Kṛṣṇa.
“At first,†Lord BalarÄma said, “I thought that these boys and calves were a display of the power of great sages like NÄrada, but now I see that all these boys and calves are You.†After inquiring from Kṛṣṇa, Lord BalarÄma understood that Kṛṣṇa Himself had become many. That the Lord can do this is stated in the Brahma-saá¹hitÄ (5.33). Advaitam acyutam anÄdim ananta-rÅ«pam: although He is one, He can expand Himself in so many forms. According to the Vedic version, ekaá¹ bahu syÄm: He can expand Himself into many thousands and millions but still remain one. In that sense, everything is spiritual because everything is an expansion of Kṛṣṇa; that is, everything is an expansion either of Kṛṣṇa Himself or of His potency. Because the potency is nondifferent from the potent, the potency and the potent are one (Å›akti-Å›aktimatayor abhedaḥ). The MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s, however, say, cid-acit-samanvayaḥ: spirit and matter are one. This is a wrong conception. Spirit (cit) is different from matter (acit), as explained by Kṛṣṇa Himself in Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ (7.4-5):
bhÅ«mir Äpo ’nalo vÄyuḥ
khaá¹ mano buddhir eva ca
ahaá¹…kÄra itÄ«yaá¹ me
bhinnÄ praká¹›tir aá¹£á¹adhÄ
apareyam itas tv anyÄá¹
praká¹›tiá¹ viddhi me parÄm
jÄ«va-bhÅ«tÄá¹ mahÄ-bÄho
yayedaá¹ dhÄryate jagat
“Earth, water, fire, air, ether, mind, intelligence and false ego — all together these eight comprise My separated material energies. But besides this inferior nature, O mighty-armed Arjuna, there is a superior energy of Mine, which consists of all living entities who are struggling with material nature and are sustaining the universe.†Spirit and matter cannot be made one, for actually they are superior and inferior energies, yet the MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s, or Advaita-vÄdÄ«s, try to make them one. This is wrong. Although spirit and matter ultimately come from the same one source, they cannot be made one. For example, there are many things that come from our bodies, but although they come from the same source, they cannot be made one. We should be careful to note that although the supreme source is one, the emanations from this source should be separately regarded as inferior and superior. The difference between the MÄyÄvÄda and Vaiṣṇava philosophies is that the Vaiṣṇava philosophy recognizes this fact. ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu’s philosophy, therefore, is called acintya-bhedÄbheda — simultaneous oneness and difference. For example, fire and heat cannot be separated, for where there is fire there is heat and where there is heat there is fire. Nonetheless, although we cannot touch fire, heat we can tolerate. Therefore, although they are one, they are different.