tad-vihÄ«naá¹ jÄrÄṇÄm iva

 tat - of it (awareness of the Lord's greatness); vihÄ«nam - devoid; jÄrÄṇÄm - of illicit lovers; iva - like.


Text

On the other hand, displays of devotion without knowledge of God's greatness are no better than the affairs of illicit lovers.

Purport

The gopÄ«s' loving exchanges with Kṛṣṇa have nothing to do with mundane passion, but because they resemble lusty activities in the material world, those with impure minds mistake them for such. ÅšrÄ«la PrabhupÄda was therefore always very cautious in presenting Lord Kṛṣṇa's rÄsa-lÄ«lÄ. Lord Caitanya was also very cautious in discussing such topics. Although He was always merged in gopÄ«-bhÄva, He discussed Kṛṣṇa's loving affairs with the gopÄ«s only with a few intimate disciples. For the mass of people, Lord Caitanya distributed love of God by propagating the congregational chanting of the holy name.

ÅšrÄ«la PrabhupÄda would sometimes tell a story to show how most people mistake the transcendental loving affairs of RÄdhÄ and Kṛṣṇa as mundane dealings between an ordinary boy and girl. Once there was a fire in a barn, and one of the cows almost died of fright. Afterward, whenever that cow saw the color red, she would think a fire was burning and become panic-stricken. Similarly, as soon as an ordinary man or woman sees a picture of RÄdhÄ and Kṛṣṇa, he or she immediately thinks Their relationship is just like that between an ordinary boyfriend and girlfriend or husband and wife. Unfortunately, professional reciters of the BhÄgavatam promote this misconception by jumping into Lord Kṛṣṇa's conjugal pastimes in the Tenth Canto, although neither they nor their audience are fit to hear them. The authorized approach to the BhÄgavatam is to first carefully read the first nine cantos, which establish the greatness of the Supreme Lord, His universal form, His material and spiritual energies, His creation of the cosmos, His incarnations, and so on. Reading the first two cantos is like contemplating the lotus feet of the Lord, and as one gradually progresses, one looks upon the Lord's various bodily limbs, until finally one sees His smiling face in the Tenth Canto's account of His pastimes with the gopÄ«s.

If Kṛṣṇa's pastimes with the gopÄ«s' were lusty affairs, neither pure brahmacÄrÄ«s like NÄrada and Åšukadeva nor liberated sages like Uddhava and VyÄsadeva would have praised them so highly. Such great devotees are free from all mundane passion; so how could they be interested in RÄdhÄ and Kṛṣṇa if Their love were a worldly sex affair?

From the ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam we learn that all the gopÄ«s had spiritual bodies. This is another proof that Kṛṣṇa's pastimes with the gopÄ«s are supramundane. When Kṛṣṇa played His flute in Vá¹›ndÄvana on the full-moon night of the autumn season, the gopÄ«s went to Him in their spiritual bodies. Many of these gopÄ«s are eternal companions of Kṛṣṇa, and when He exhibits His transcendental pastimes within the material world, they come with Him. But some of the gopÄ«s who joined Kṛṣṇa's pastimes within this material world came from the status of ordinary human beings. By always thinking of Kṛṣṇa as their beloved, they became purified of all material contamination and elevated to the same status as the eternally liberated gopÄ«s. ÅšrÄ«la PrabhupÄda writes, "All the gopÄ«s who concentrated their minds on Kṛṣṇa in the spirit of paramour love became fully uncontaminated from all the fruitive reactions of material nature, and some of them immediately gave up their material bodies developed under the three modes of material nature" (Kṛṣṇa, p. 242). ÅšrÄ«la ViÅ›vanÄtha CakravartÄ« ṬhÄkura explains in his commentary on the ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam that here "giving up the material body" does not mean dying but rather purification of all material contamination and attainment of a purely spiritual body.

When Åšukadeva GosvÄmÄ« began reciting Kṛṣṇa's rÄsa-lÄ«lÄ pastimes, MahÄrÄja ParÄ«ká¹£it raised a doubt similar to that addressed in this sÅ«tra. He asked, "How could the gopÄ«s attain liberation by thinking of a paramour?" Åšukadeva replied that even if one thinks that the gopÄ«s were motivated by lust, any association with Kṛṣṇa will purify one of all material desires. Because He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, even someone like ÅšiÅ›upÄla, who was absorbed in thinking of Kṛṣṇa out of envy, gained salvation. As ÅšrÄ«la PrabhupÄda explains in Kṛṣṇa (p. 245):

The conclusion is that if one somehow or other becomes attached to Kṛṣṇa or attracted to Him, either because of His beauty, quality, opulence, fame, strength, renunciation, or knowledge, or even through lust, anger, or fear, or through affection or friendship, then one's salvation and freedom from material contamination are assured.

The society girl KubjÄ is an example of how even lusty attraction to Kṛṣṇa frees one from material contamination. She approached Kṛṣṇa with lusty desire, but her lust was relieved just by smelling the fragrance of Kṣṇa's lotus feet.

While the word kÄma (lust) is used to describe the gopÄ«s' feelings toward Kṛṣṇa, in their case it is actually a transcendental emotion. The gopÄ«s wanted Kṛṣṇa to be their husband, but there was no possibility of His marrying all of them in the usual sense. So they married regular husbands (though some were unmarried at the time of the rÄsa dance) but retained their love for Kṛṣṇa. Therefore Kṛṣṇa's loving relationship with the gopÄ«s is known as pÄrakÄ«ya-rasa (paramour love). But whereas in the material world the relationship of a married woman with a paramour is abominable, in the spiritual world it is the most exalted relationship one can have with Kṛṣṇa. Just as a tree reflected in the water appears upside down, so that which is topmost in the spiritual world—Kṛṣṇa's loving dealings with the gopÄ«s—becomes abominable when reflected in the material world as illicit sexual affairs. When people imitate Kṛṣṇa's rÄsa dance with the gopÄ«s, they enjoy only the perverted reflection of the transcendental pÄrakÄ«ya-rasa. ÅšrÄ«la PrabhupÄda writes in Kṛṣṇa (p. 240), "It is stated in the ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam that one should not imitate this pÄrakÄ«ya-rasa even in dream or imagination. Those who do so drink the most deadly poison."

Another characteristic of mundane paramour love is that it is unsteady. As soon as one's sex pleasure is disrupted, one seeks out a new partner. The ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam predicts that in the Age of Kali marriage will become degraded to a mere convenience for sex pleasure and will break apart as soon as that pleasure abates. But once one revives one's loving relationship with Kṛṣṇa, that relationship will remain steady and ever fresh.

The gopÄ«s' love for Kṛṣṇa is within ÅšrÄ« Kṛṣṇa's hlÄdinÄ«-Å›akti, or internal pleasure potency. When ÅšrÄ« Kṛṣṇa wants to enjoy, He associates with the gopÄ«s, not with women of the material world. This is another indication of the gopÄ«s' superexcellent spiritual position. In Kṛṣṇa's exchanges with the gopÄ«s through the hlÄdinÄ«-Å›akti, there is unlimited and unending ecstasy; this pleasure is far different from the quickly satiated lusts of sexual affairs, which are soon followed by painful entanglements and karmic reactions.

Even after Åšukadeva GosvÄmÄ« had explained the spiritual nature of the love that Kṛṣṇa and the gopÄ«s exchanged during the rÄsa dance, MahÄrÄja ParÄ«ká¹£it questioned Åšukadeva as to why Kṛṣṇa would act in a way that would make ordinary people see Him as immoral. Åšukadeva replied that because Lord Kṛṣṇa is the supreme īśvara, or controller, He is independent of all social and religious principles. This is simply more evidence of His greatness. As the supreme īśvara, Lord Kṛṣṇa may sometimes violate His own instructions with impunity, but that is possible only for the supreme controller, not for us. Since no one can imitate such astounding activities of Lord Kṛṣṇa's as creating the universe or lifting Govardhana Hill, no one should try to imitate His rÄsa dance, either. To further clear up all doubts about Kṛṣṇa and the gopÄ«s, one may read Chapter Thirty-two of Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead.