Pradyumna: "After binding Asvatthama, Arjuna wanted to take him to the military camp. The Personality of Godhead Sri Krᚣáša, looking on with His lotus eyes, spoke to angry Arjuna. Lord Sri Krᚣáša said: O Arjuna, you should not show mercy by releasing this relative of a brahmaáša (brahma-bandhu), for he has killed innocent boys in their sleep."
Prabhupada:
sibiraya niniᚣantaáš
rajjva baddhva ripuáš balat
praharjunaáš prakupito
bhagavan ambujekᚣaášaḼ;
[SB 1.7.34]
mainaáš partharhasi tratuáš
brahma-bandhum imaáš jahi
yo 'sav anagasaḼ; suptan
avadhin nisi balakan
[SB 1.7.35]
So bhagavan ambujekᚣaášaḼ;. Ambuja means lotus flower. Bhagavan is described in many places as ambujekᚣa-lotus-eyed, lotus feet, lotus navel, in so many ways, lotus palms. So ambujekᚣaáša, very beautiful eyes like the petals of a padma, lotus flower. But at the same time, prakupita, He's angry. He's angry. Still, ambujekᚣaáša. Not that as the Mayavadis think, that "God is kind. Why He should be angry?" But here it is said, prakupita. Pra means "specifically." Prakrᚣáša-rupeáša kupitaḼ;, "very angry." Prakupita. And He was, rather, glad that this Asvatthama, who happens to be the son of a brahmaáša... Still, He was angry. He asked him not to excuse this rascal. Not to excuse. It is next verse, it is said, mainaáš partharhasi tratuáš brahma-bandhum imaáš jahi. He's brahma-bandhu. He's not a brahmaáša. He's brahma-bandhu. Everyone can say, "I am the son of a brahmaáša." That is brahma-bandhu. Or a friend of a brahmaáša. That does not mean he is a brahmaáša. This is the idea. Brahmaáša is not the body. Brahmaáša is the quality. If the brahmaáša is body, then when a brahmaáša is dead the sons take the dead body to the crematorium place and burn the body. Then if the body is brahmaáša, then the sons are committing sins by brahma-hatya. No. That is not brahma-hatya. Brahmaáša is the quality. That quality is gone. With the departure of the soul, that quality is gone. Now this body is simply a lump of matter, so there is no shame when the body is burnt into ashes.
The idea is that, as described in the sastra, who is a brahmaáša, who is a sudra, who is a kᚣatriya, who is a vaisya... It is all described in the Bhagavad-gita. So satyaáš samo damas titikᚣa arjavam, jĂąanaáš vijĂąanam astikyaáš brahma-karma svabhava-jam [Bg. 18.42]. Karma, guáša and karma. Here Asvatthama, although he's born of a brahmaáša father, he did not possess the quality of a brahmaáša, neither the work of a brahmaáša. He degraded himself. First of all, he was engaged as a soldier to assist, to flatter Duryodhana. He wanted to please Duryodhana by killing the Paášá¸avas. But he was such a fool, instead of killing the Paášá¸avas, he killed the five sleeping sons of the Paášá¸avas. How much abominable he is, just imagine. Here it is said, suptan avadhin nisi balakan. First of all, they were minor aged, and they were sleeping, and they were killed at night. Just see. What kind of brahmaáša he is! A brahmaáša's business is not to kill. Even brahmaáša can kill, he doesn't require even sword or any other weapon. Simply by cursing he can killâbrahmaáša was so powerful. But still, it is not the business of a brahmaáša. When killing is required, it is done by the kᚣatriyas, not by the brahmaášas. Just like Visvamitra Muni, he was disturbed by the Taá¸aka rakᚣasi. He was quite powerful. Even by cursing he could kill this Taá¸aka rakᚣasi in the forest, but he did not do so. For killing the rakᚣasi he approached Maharaja Dasaratha. Because he is kᚣatriya, he is the king. His business is to give protection to the disturbed citizens. Just like we apply to the magistrate, similarly the king is responsible. So he did not kill. Visvamitra formerly was kᚣatriya, but since he became brahmaáša... By his endeavor in lifetime, he became a brahmaáša, a great sage, rᚣi. So since he became brahmaáša, he was not interested in killing anyone. That is not brahmaáša's business. Brahmaáša's business is samo damas titikᚣa. Even if he is disturbed by somebody, titikᚣa, he tolerates. Kama-rupa-tapasvin. He does not become... And when it is intolerable, he approaches the kᚣatriya.
So in considering all angles of vision, this Asvatthama was not a brahmaáša. Therefore Krᚣáša personally advised him, ma enaáš partha arhasi tratum: "Don't excuse him. Kill him, this brahma-bandhu. He has done wrong, now he deserves to be killed." It is clearly said. So does it mean that Krᚣáša is advising brahma-hatya? No. Krᚣáša cannot do that. He is the teacher, world teacher. How He can advise somebody, especially His friend Arjuna? Bhakto 'si priyo 'si me [Bg. 4.3]. Can you advise anything adversely to your friend? To your son? No. I must give very good advice. So Krᚣáša is advising Arjuna, "Don't excuse this rascal brahma-bandhu. Don't excuse." This is Krᚣáša's advice. But it does not mean that we can do anything and everything under the pretext of Krᚣáša's advice. You must be first of all a confidential friend or servant of Krᚣáša. You must receive direct order from Krᚣáša. Then you can do it. Otherwise not. Otherwise not. Under the pretext that "Krᚣáša said," "My spiritual master has said," "Prabhupada has said," we manufacture something. Don't do that. Unless you are directly ordered, you cannot do at least such things as to chastise a brahma-bandhu. This should not be done. Here is direct order.
So bhagavan ambujekᚣaášaḼ;. Although He's angry, although He's the Supreme Lord, Bhagavan... He's not so-called nonviolent. How nonviolent? Nonviolent or violent. Violence is also one of the qualifications of God. Especially in political matters, when the kᚣatriyas are dealing, there is always violence. Without violence, kᚣatriya has no meaning. Kᚣat, kᚣat means injury. Trayate. Kᚣatriya's duty is to save the citizen from being injured by others. That is kᚣatriya. Even an animal. Animal..., just like this Kali was trying to kill cow. Maharaja Parikᚣit was on his tour. He saw that a black man was trying to kill a cow. So immediately he took his sword, "Who are you, rascal? You are trying to kill a cow in my kingdom?" That is kᚣatriya's duty. Kᚣatriya's duty is to give protection from injury for the safety of the citizen. The citizen must feel safety, that "We have got such a nice king. There is no fear of anything." It is said in the Bhagavatam there was no anxiety. The citizens should feel so much safe, that "We have such a nice king that we have no danger at all. Not being injured, not our property being stolen or injustice given." That is the real governmentâwhen the citizens will feel completely safe. That requires kᚣatriya. Not these camara, bhangis, and sudras voted and become the president and minister. That will not be successful. That is not possible. There must be trained-up kᚣatriyas, then there will be good government. Trained.
They should be trained means they should be advised by the brahmaášas. Therefore four divisions required. The brahmaášas have no interest or they have no time. Even a brahmaáša is made king... It is not his business. He may do it for some time, temporarily. Just like Visvamitra also did. But it is not his business. The brahmaáša should give advice to the ministers or the legislators. They should be all qualified brahmaášas, not paid man. Paid man has nothing to do... Even during the time of Maharaja Candragupta, emperor, he had a brahmaáša minister, prime minister, Caášakya Paášá¸ita. He was not taking a single farthing as salary. When once explanation was called for from Caášakya Paášá¸ita by Candragupta, immediately he resigned. "You cannot call any explanation. Then I resign." And he was living in a cottage, not that palatial building. He was living in a cottage. That was the system. Brahmaáša lived very humbly. He was not poor. Not that they are poor men. They were so rich that when Visvamitra approached Maharaja Dasaratha, immediately he vacated his seat and welcomed, "Sir, sit down here." So respectful. This is Vedic culture. The brahmaášas would not accept any comfort, but the kᚣatriyas would be very, very glad to give all comforts to the brahmaášas. In our sastra, brahmaáša-bhojana, it is recommended that brahmaášas should be invited to take prasada. Now they have manufactured daridra-bhojana or daridra-narayaáša-bhojana. They have made daridra-narayaáša. But that is not Vedic culture. Vedic culture is to find out qualified brahmaáša, sages, sannyasis. They would refuse, but still they'll fall down, "Please come, take some prasada." This is Vedic culture. Brahmaáša's position is very, very exalted. Now, since after the battle of Kurukᚣetra, they have become brahma-bandhus. The example is here, brahma-bandhu.
So we should not become brahma-bandhu. We should become actually brahmaáša. And brahma janati iti brahmaášaḼ;. One who knows Brahman, he is brahmaáša. And one who knows Parabrahman, he is Vaiᚣášava. Brahman and Parabrahman. So Krᚣáša is Parabrahman. In the Bhagavad-gita it is said, paraáš brahma paraáš dhama pavitraáš paramaáš bhavan puruᚣaáš sasvataáš divyam [Bg. 10.12]. So to realize Brahman realization... That is also spiritual. That is not material. Ahaáš brahmasmi. That is spiritual. But that is the first appreciation of the Absolute Truth. That is not complete appreciation or complete knowledge. Complete knowledge is when one understands the paraáš brahma. That is complete understanding. Not simply Brahman: Brahman, Paramatma, and Bhagavan. Brahmeti paramatmeti bhagavan iti sabdyate. The Absolute Truth, vadanti tat tattva-vidas tattvam [SB 1.2.11]. Tattvam means Absolute Truth. What is that Absolute? Advaya-jĂąanam. One. Brahman, Paramatma and Bhagavan. They are not different. Advayam, the same Absolute. But it is due to my position, angle of vision, He's realized in three different featuresâBrahman, Paramatma and Bhagavan. That one tattva-vastu, Absolute Truth. So to understand even Brahman, one requires to become brahmaáša. Brahma janati iti brahmaášaḼ;. Brahman, understands Brahman, that is the first step. Then you have to make further progress. The example we have given many times, that we are in the sunshine. Now there is sunshine, that is also Brahman, or heat and light. But the heat and light here, ninety-three millions miles away from the sun, and the heat and light in the sunâa difference. That temperature is different. So when you go to the sun-god, that position, and to enjoy heat and light from ninety-three millions miles away, that is also difference. Although heat and light is there in the sun globe and heat and light in the sunshine, but still, sunshine is not the sun globe. Sun globe is not the sun-god. Similarly... This is a crude example. Therefore Caitanya Mahaprabhu's philosophy is acintya-bhedabheda-tattva: everything is God, and everything is not God. Bheda-abheda. Bheda means not, different, and abheda means one. Acintya-bhedabheda-tattva. Acintya... For us, how we can adjust, at the same time one and different? Therefore it is acintya. Not cintya, cintaniya. In our present sense it is difficult to adjust things how we are one and different with the Supreme Absolute Truth. Acintya-bhedabheda-tattva.
So in this way we have to understand. Tad-vijĂąanarthaáš sa gurum evabhigacchet [MU 1.2.12]. Through parampara system. Just as Arjuna is in the parampara system, Arjuna was being taught directly by Krᚣáša, so you should learn from Arjuna. That is parampara system. Evaáš parampara-praptam imaáš rajarᚣayo viduḼ; [Bg. 4.2]. Then you will understand. If you take the words of Arjuna, how he appreciated Bhagavad-gita and how he appreciated Krᚣáša, then your knowledge is perfect. If you manufacture meaning and manufacture idea by your concocted, poor fund of knowledge. AcintyaḼ; khalu ye bhava na taášs tarkeáša yojayet. Which is beyond your sense perception... Adhokᚣaja. Therefore Krᚣáša is called adhokᚣaja. Adhah-krtaáš akᚣajaáš indriya-jĂąanaáš yena. Adhah-krta, subdued. You cannot approach Krᚣáša by material sense perception. It is not possible. Therefore His name is adhokᚣaja. Still you have to offer your service to the Supreme. Sa vai puášsaáš paro dharmo yato bhaktir adhokᚣaje [SB 1.2.6]. Adhokᚣaje. This is the idea, that unless we approach the adhokᚣaja, Krᚣáša... And Krᚣáša... AtaḼ; sri-krᚣáša-namadi na bhaved grahyam indriyaiḼ; [Cc. Madhya 17.136]. Those who are trying to study Krᚣáša by these blunt senses, they'll never understand Krᚣáša. They'll never understand.
Therefore Krᚣáša is regretting, that "This rascal, they consider Me as human being." Avajananti maáš muá¸ha manuᚣiáš tanum asritam [Bg. 9.11]. They have been described as rascals. One who estimates Krᚣáša from material point of view, material vision, he is muá¸ha. Therefore he cannot surrender to Krᚣáša. Na maáš duᚣkrtino muá¸haḼ; prapadyante naradhamaḼ; [Bg. 7.15]. Lowest of the mankind, naradhama. Why lowest? Sinful? Duᚣkrtina? These things are there. If we want to understand Krᚣáša, then we should take the prescription of Krᚣáša. What Krᚣáša said? Bhaktya mam abhijanati: [Bg. 18.55] "One can understand Me by the process of bhakti." Never said, Krᚣáša, that "Yogi can understand Me," or "The jĂąanis can understand Me" or "The karmis can understand." Never. Nahaáš tiᚣášhami yoginaáš hrdayeᚣu. Although yogis are trying to see Krᚣáša always within the heart... Yaáš brahma varuášendra-rudra-marutaḼ; stunvanti dhyanavasthita-tad-gatena manasa pasyanti yaáš yoginaḼ;... [SB 12.13.1]. Those who are perfect yogis, they see always Krᚣáša within the core of the heart. Man-mana bhava mad-bhaktaḼ;. That is perfect yogi. That is... Krᚣáša admits,
yoginam api sarveᚣaáš
mad-gatenantar-atmana
sraddhavan bhajate yo maáš
sa me yuktatamo mataḼ;
[Bg. 6.47]
That is first-class yogi, one who is thinking of Krᚣáša always within the core of the heart. So yogis, jĂąanis, karmis, bhaktas... So when you become bhakta, then you are perfect karmi, you are perfect yogi, you are perfect jĂąani. Unless you are perfect jĂąani, how you can surrender to Krᚣáša? Bahunaáš janmanam ante jĂąanavan maáš prapadyate [Bg. 7.19]. After many, many births cultivating knowledge, when he's actually wise-jĂąanavan. Then what is the symptom? Maáš prapadyate: he surrenders to Krᚣáša. Why? VasudevaḼ; sarvam iti sa mahatma sudurlabhaḼ; [Bg. 7.19]. He understands that Krᚣáša is everything. That is real knowledge. Otherwise, it is not knowledge, it is speculation.
So speculation will not help us. We must have perfect knowledge, and that knowledge is given by Krᚣáša. You take it and follow mahajana like Arjuna and other devotees, then you understand Krᚣáša. And as soon as you understand Krᚣáša, you are immediately liberated. Immediately.
janma karma ca me divyaáš
yo janati tattvataḼ;
tyaktva dehaáš punar janma
naiti...
[Bg. 4.9]
That is liberation. So simple thing, man-mana bhava mad-bhakto mad-yaji [Bg. 18.65]. Simply think of Krᚣáša, chant Krᚣáša's name, Hare Krᚣáša, and be honest, and liberation is guaranteed.
Thank you very much. (end)
760929SB.VRN