Pradyumna (leads chanting, etc.):
arjuna uvaca
senayor ubhayor madhye
rathaáš sthapaya me 'cyuta
yavad etan nirikᚣe 'haáš
yoddhu-kaman avasthitan
kair maya saha yoddhavyam
asmin raa-samudyame
[Bg. 1.21-22]
Translation: "Arjuna said: O infallible one, please draw my chariot between the two armies so that I may see who is present here, who is desirous of fighting, and with whom I must contend in this great battle attempt."
Prabhupada: Senayor ubhayor madhye rathaáš sthapaya me acyuta [Bg. 1.21]. Before this, Krᚣáša was addressed as Hrᚣikesa. Hrᚣikesa we have explained. Now Krᚣáša is addressed here Acyuta. Cyuta means fallen, and acyuta means not fallen. Just like we are fallen. We are fallen conditioned souls. In this material world we have come with an enjoying spirit. Therefore we are fallen. If one keeps his position rightly, he does not fall. Otherwise he is degraded. That is fallen condition. So all the living entities within this material world, beginning from Brahma down to the small insignificant ant, they are all fallen, fallen conditioned souls. Why they are fallen?
krᚣáša bhuliya jiva bhoga vaĂącha kare
pasate maya tare japaášiya dhare
Fallen means when the living entities are under the clutches of this material energy. That is called fallen. Just like a man, when he is under police custody, it is to be understood that he is a criminal, he is fallen. He has fallen down from good citizenship. Similarly, we are all parts and parcels of Krᚣáša. Mamaivaášso jiva-bhuta [Bg. 15.7]. So as part and parcel, our position is to live with Krᚣáša. Just like this is my finger, part and parcel of my body. The finger must remain attached with this body. When this finger is cut off and fallen, although it is finger, it is no longer as important as it was formerly when it was attached with this body. So anyone who is not attached with the service of the Supreme Lord, he is fallen. This is the conclusion.
But Krᚣáša is not fallen. If Krᚣáša... Because He comes to reclaim us.
yada yada hi dharmasya
glanir bhavati bharata
abhyutthanam adharmasya
tadatmanaáš srjamy aham
[Bg. 4.7]
Krᚣáša says that "I appear when there is discrepancies in the, I mean to say, occupational duties of the living entities." Dharmasya glanir bhavati. We don't translate dharma as "religion." Religion in the English dictionary, it is "a kind of faith." Faith can be changed. But dharma is a word which cannot be changed. If it is changed, it is to be understood artificial. Just like the water. Water is liquid, everyone knows. But sometimes water becomes hard, very hard, ice. So that is not the natural position of water. Artificially, on account of excessive cold or by artificial means the water becomes solid. But the real position of water is liquidity.
So when we are detached from the service of the Lord, this is also unnatural, unnatural. Natural position is that we must be engaged in the service of the Lord. That is our natural position. Therefore the Vaiᚣášava kavi says that krᚣáša bhuliya jiva bhoga vaĂącha kare. When a living entity forgets Krᚣáša, forgets Krᚣáša's position... Krᚣáša's position... Krᚣáša says, bhoktaraáš yajĂąa-tapasaáš sarva-loka-mahesvaram: [Bg. 5.29] "I am the proprietor, I am the enjoyer." This is the Krᚣáša's position. He never falls down that position. Krᚣáša is enjoyer. He keeps always that position. He never falls down. He never comes to the position of being enjoyed. That is not possible. If you want to bring Krᚣáša on the position of being enjoyed, then you are defeated. Being enjoyed means keeping Krᚣáša in front, I want to get some profit of sense gratification. That is our unnatural position. Krᚣáša will never agree. Krᚣáša will never agree. Krᚣáša cannot be enjoyed. He is always enjoyer. He is always the proprietor. So krᚣáša bhuliya jiva means when we forget this position of Krᚣáša, that He is the Supreme Enjoyer, He is the supreme proprietor... This is called forgetfulness. As soon as I think that "I am enjoyer, I am proprietor," this is my fallen stage. Krᚣáša bhuliya jiva bhoga vaĂącha kare. Then japaášiya dhare, maya, immediately maya captures.
Therefore a conditioned soul, fallen conditioned soul, is struggling for existence. He is trying to be enjoyer, he is trying to be proprietor. That is his artificial way of life. Just like if a woman wants to become a man, that is her artificial position. She may dress herself as a man, just like in the western countries sometimes we see woman is artificially dressing like man, with hat, coat, man, riding on horse. That is artificial. So similarly, our position here in this material world is artificial. We are trying to imitate a man.
Actually the living entities are described in the Bhagavad-gita, prakrti. Prakrti means woman. And puruᚣa means man. So the living entities are never described as puruᚣa. Puruᚣa is Krᚣáša. Puruᚣa sasvata. When Arjuna said, paraáš brahma paraáš dhama pavitraáš paramaáš bhavan, puruᚣaáš sasvatam adyam... [Bg. 10.12]. Puruᚣaáš sasvatam. Krᚣáša is always puruᚣa. God cannot be female. God is always male, puruᚣa. And we are prakrti. That is described in the Bhagavad-gita. Apareyam itas tu viddhi me prakrtim para [Bg. 7.5].
After describing the material energy, bhumir apo analo vayuḼ; [Bg. 7.4], earth, water, air, fire, this material.... This is also female, prakrti. Female means.... In India we have got little experience. The female is always controlled. Female is never given the position of controller. Nowadays it is going on. Just like Indira Gandhi, she has given the position of controller. This is artificial. In the history of India, greater India, Mahabharata, you will never find that a woman has been given a position of controller. No. It is not possible.
We have to take things from the sastra. In the Bhagavad-gita also woman's position has been equated with sudra. StriyaḼ; sudras tatha vaisyas te 'pi yanti paraáš gatim. So position must be ascertained. But this position is artificial. Here either woman or man, they are in artificial position. Because a woman may be in women's dress, but her mind is like man. She also wants to enjoy. And the others, the so-called man.... The so-called man is also not man; he is woman. Prakrti. Apareyam itas tu viddhi me prakrtiáš para [Bg. 7.5]. Prakrti. As the earth, water, air, fire, sky, they are also controlled, the supreme controller is Krᚣáša, similarly, the so-called man or woman in this material world, they are also controlled. Nobody can say that "I am not controlled." Who is here? You must be controlled.
Therefore we see two prakrtis: para prakrti and apara prakrti. But all of them are controlled; none of them are the controller. And that is the difference between puruᚣa and prakrti. Puruᚣa means controller. And prakrti means controlled. Puruᚣa means predominator, and prakrti means predominated. This is the difference. So Krᚣáša does not fall from his position of predominator. Therefore He is addressed as Acyuta, Acyuta. Senayor ubhayor madhye rathaáš sthapaya me acyuta [Bg. 1.21]. Another meaning of Acyuta... Krᚣáša is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and Arjuna knows that "I am not controller; I am controlled." He is devotee, he knows his position. Therefore he is now trying to control Krᚣáša. He is ordering Krᚣáša. Senayor ubhayor madhye rathaáš sthapaya: "My dear Krᚣáša," he is not addressing as Krᚣáša-Acyuta, "now you place my chariot between the two parties." This is ordering. That means Arjuna becoming controller. And Krᚣáša becoming controlled. Just the opposite. Therefore Arjuna knows his subordinate position and he is ordering to Krᚣáša. So indirectly he is begging to be excused: "My dear Krᚣáša, I cannot order You. Order must come from You. But because You promised to carry out my order, You wanted to become my chariot driver, therefore I am ordering. Therefore I am ordering. I am not in position of ordering to You and You promised to carry out my order, and I think You are fixed up in Your that promise. Therefore I am asking you, Acyuta. You don't fall from Your promise." This is the... senayor ubhayor madhye rathaáš sthapaya me acyuta [Bg. 1.21]. What is the number of verse?
Devotee: Page forty-eight.
Prabhupada: Forty-eight? The next point is that Arjuna wanted to see with whom he had to fight. He had no desire to fight. That will be explained. He was fighting unwillingly. Unwillingly. Because he is a Vaiᚣášava, unnecessarily he does not want to kill, although he is kᚣatriya. It is his duty. Whenever there is discrepancy, killing, as representative of Krᚣáša... Krᚣáša has got two business. Paritraášaya sadhunaáš vinasaya ca duᚣkrtam [Bg. 4.8]. He has got two businesses. One business is to give protection to the devotees, sadhu, sadhu. Sadhu means devotee. Sadhu does not mean simply by changing dress, saffron color, and smoking beedies. That is not sadhu. Sadhu means devotee.
One who is devotee... That is explained in many sastras. SadhavaḼ; sadhu-bhuᚣaášam. Sadhu-bhuᚣaášam.
titikᚣavaḼ; karuášikaḼ;
suhrdaḼ; sarva-bhutanam
ajata-satravaḼ; santaḼ;
sadhavaḼ; sadhu-bhuᚣaášaḼ;
[SB 3.25.21]
This is the qualification of sadhu. Sadhu is titikᚣava, tolerates all kinds of miserable conditions. He is sadhu. Because this is a place of miserable condition. A sadhu learns how to tolerate. Sadhu is never disturbed. Yasmin sthito guruášapi duḼ;khena na vicalyate [Bg. 6.20-23]. A sadhu, who has got the shelter of Krᚣáša, if he is placed in the severest type of dangerous condition, he is never disturbed. Just like Prahlada Maharaja, his father was putting him in so many dangerous conditions, even he was supplying with poison. He knew that "My father has given me poison to drink. All right, let me drink. If Krᚣáša likes, He will save me. I am now put into such dangerous position. I have to drink. Father is giving poison. Who can check?" And such a big powerful Hiraášyakasipu. The mother cried, requested... He forced the mother, Prahlada's mother, "Give your son this poison." So she begged so much, but he was a rascal demon. "No, you must give." So the mother knew, the son knew that the rascal father is giving this poison. What can he do, a small child? "All right, let me drink." Guruášapi duḼ;khena na vicalyate. He is not agitating. "All right, if Krᚣáša likes, I will live." This is the position of sadhu. He is not disturbed. TitikᚣavaḼ;. In all circumstances, he is tolerant. That is sadhu. Sadhu does not become disturbed. TitikᚣavaḼ;. At the same time, karuášikaḼ;. He is himself disturbed, but he is merciful to others.
Just like Jesus Christ. He is being crucified, and still he is merciful: "God, these people do not know what they are doing. Please excuse them." This is sadhu. He is personally being disturbed by the demons, but still, he is merciful to the general people. They are suffering for want of Krᚣáša consciousness. So even up to the point of death, he is trying to preach Krᚣáša consciousness. "Let the people be benefited. Eh, what is this material body? Even if I am killed, I am not killed. This body is killed, that's all." This is sadhu. TitikᚣavaḼ; karuášikaḼ;. In one side he is tolerant, and other side, merciful.
In the material world, when one man is disturbed, he cannot do any beneficial work to any others. He is disturbed. "No, I am very much disturbed. Don't talk with me." No. But sadhu still goes on benefiting the people in general. TitikᚣavaḼ; karuášikaḼ; [SB 3.25.21]. And what kind of benefit? The so-called rascals humanitarian work? No. Suhrdaáš sarva-bhutanam [Bg. 5.29]. He is beneficial to all kinds of living entities.
Not this rascaldom, daridra-narayaáša. Just like one rascal has manufactured this daridra-narayaáša. The poor man has become Narayaáša, and the goat Narayaáša is killed for their feeding. Not this kind of sadhu. Suhrdaáš sarva-bhutanam. A sadhu will not allow any kind of killing. See in the Christian religion, it is first injunction is "Thou shalt not kill." If you want to become religious... They are simply killing, and still, they are claiming "Christian." What kind of Christian? Simply their business is killing. So it is very difficult to find out a Christian, although they are claiming, I am "Christian." It is very difficult. Because their business is killing. And Lord Jesus Christ ordered, first order is, "Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not covet." Who is following?
So sadhu is suhrdaáš sarva-bhutanam. Why he should allow animal killing? They are also living entities, but for their benefit, the so-called sadhu says, "The animal has no soul." What is this nonsense? Animal has no soul? Why? What is the difference between animal and man? What are the symptoms of possessing the soul? They are all equal. The man also eats, the animal also eats. The man also sleeps, the animal also sleeps, the man also have sex life, the animals also have sex life. The man also defends, the animals also defends. So where is the deficiency that you say that the animal has no soul?
Imperfect knowledge. Or making adjustment for their own benefit. Now they are making correction: "Thou shalt not kill," "Thou shalt not murder." That means it will come to human being. But the actual commandment is "Thou shalt not kill." But these Christian people, they are making some amendment, "Thou shalt not murder." Because murder will apply to the killing of human beings. But Lord Jesus Christ never said like that. "Thou shalt not kill." It is applicable both for human being and for animal or even for trees. Unnecessarily you cannot kill. That is sadhu. Suhrdaáš sarva-bhutanam [Bg. 5.29]. "Don't kill my brother, but you can kill my neighbors." Not like that. He is not sadhu. Sadhu is kind to all living entities.
Krᚣáša consciousness means to become kind to everyone. Therefore we say, "No meat-eating." Meat-eating means killing the animals. Killing the animals. Why you shall kill animals? You have to take Krᚣáša prasadam. Patraáš puᚣpaáš phalaáš toyaáš yo me bhaktya prayacchati, tad aham aᚣnami [Bg. 9.26]. Krᚣáša says... Krᚣáša is God. He can eat everything, everything. Krᚣáša ate fire, you know. There was forest fire in Vrndavana. All the cowherds boys they became very much frightened, "Krᚣáša." "Yes, I'm ready." He ate up all the fire. So for Krᚣáša He could eat anything He likes. He is God. But still, He recommends, patraáš puᚣpaáš phalaáš toyaáš yo me bhaktya prayacchati. Why? Because we have to take Krᚣáša's prasadam, so therefore He is recommending, "These things you can give Me." Patraáš puᚣpaáš phalaáš toyaáš. So that is our food. We are devotees of Krᚣáša. We are meant for eating the remnants of foodstuff offered to Krᚣáša.
That is our... Jihva, tara madhye... If you want to conquer the tongue, then you fix up your mind that you shall not take anything which is not offered to Krᚣáša. Then your tongue will be controlled. Tara madhye jihva ati lobhamaya sudurmati. Tongue is the bitterest enemy of the living being. The tongue is dragging. Jihva. "Kindly give me this immediately. Kindly give me this wine immediately. Kindly give me this tea immediately. Kindly give me this cigarette immediately. Kindly give me this meat." Why? Control. Krᚣáša says, patraáš puᚣpaáš phalaáš toyaáš [Bg. 9.26]. So we have to take prasadam, eat Krᚣáša prasadam. Then naturally the other things will be negativated. This is the position. Suhrdaáš sarva-bhutanam [Bg. 5.29].
So if all human beings become vegetarian, not vegetarian, but eater of the Krᚣáša's prasadam, all these liquor house and slaughterhouse and brothels will be closed. This is Krᚣáša consciousness movement. We want to close these nonsense places of sinful life: brothels, illegitimate sense gratification, sex relationship, prostitution. If we are embarrassed with this sinful life, there is no possibility of becoming again acyuta. We remain cyuta, fallen. We remain fallen.
It is not so easy thing that "I do everything, whatever I like." Some rascals preach that "Oh, religion has nothing to do with your eating. You can eat anything you like, and still you become a religious man." This is all nonsense. Nobody can become religious man if he is attracted by sinful activities. It is not possible. You must stop sinful activities. That is first condition. Otherwise you cannot understand what there... People... Perhaps, in this Krᚣáša conscious, except this Krᚣáša conscious movement, all rascals, they do not know what is God. They have no clear conception of God. Because they are sinful. We can give the name, address and everything of God, clear conception, not vague idea, "God may be like this, God may be like that." Why maybe? He is God.
veášuáš kvaášantam aravinda-dalayatakᚣaáš
barhavataášsam asitambuda-sundaraáš
gam
kandarpa-koáši-kamaniya-viseᚣa-sobhaáš
govindam adi-puruᚣaᚠtam ahaᚠbhajami
[Bs. 5.30]
Clear conception. The sastra, Brahma-saášhita, clear description of God, veášuáš kvaášantam. He is playing on flute. It is not that the Muralidhara, Syamasundara, Krᚣáša, has been imagined by some poet. No, it is described in the sastra, the form of the Lord. He is busy in playing flute, veášuáš kvaášantam. Aravinda dalayatakᚣaáš [Bs. 5.30], His eyes are just like petals of the lotus flower. Veášuáš kvaášantam aravinda, barhavataášsa, there is a peacock feather on His head. Kandarpa-koáši-kamaniya-viseᚣa-sobhaáš, and He is so beautiful that His beauty can cut down thousands of Cupids. Cupid is supposed to be the most beautiful in this material world. Kandarpa-koti-kamaniya-viseᚣa-sobhaáš govindam adi-puruᚣaáš tam ahaáš bhajami [Bs. 5.30]. Clear conception.
This is the description of God in the sastra. And when God came, Krᚣáša came on this planet, the same description. He is playing on flute, He has got the feather, peacock feather. So this painting of Krᚣáša is not an artist's imagination. It is exactly the form. So here is the form of the Lord. Here is the name of the Lord. Here is the activities of the Lord. This is clear conception. A sadhu knows what is God. Or sadhu cannot know. They are thinking, "God must be like this, God may be like this, He must be a very old man," because adi-puruᚣa. He is the first living... In this way... So you cannot create God by imagination. That is not possible. God is God, always. You have to know simply what is God. He is never cyuta.
God never becomes fallen down from His original position. The original position is, God describes Himself, mattaḼ; parataraáš nanyat: [Bg. 7.7] "There is no more superior authority than Me." That is God. One, if he is controlled, how he can be God? The supreme controller is God, the supreme controller is Krᚣáša. IsvaraḼ; paramaḼ; krᚣášaḼ; [Bs. 5.1]. IsvaraḼ; means controller, and paramaḼ; means supreme. And who is that? Krᚣáša. Krᚣáša says also, mattaḼ; parataraáš nanyat kiĂącid asti dhanaĂąjaya [Bg. 7.7]. So He is acyuta. He keeps His position. He never falls down. We are all fallen souls. Because our position, our Acyuta position is to serve Krᚣáša. Because we are part and parcel of Krᚣáša.
The same example: Just like this finger is part and parcel of my body. Its business is to serve the body. That is the business. There is no other business. A finger can pick up a rasagulla and keep it here. The finger cannot eat. Similarly, we cannot eat directly. That is our diseased condition. We have to offer Krᚣáša. When Krᚣáša eats, if we eat that, then we become energized. Just like you rasagulla put into the mouth. When it goes to the stomach, the finger immediately becomes reddish. The finger enjoys. Not only the finger, the eyes enjoy, the legs enjoy, because the energy is distributed. Directly we cannot be energized by eating. We must eat Krᚣáša's prasadam. This is principle. Jivera svarupa haya nitya krᚣáša dasa [Cc. Madhya 20.108-109].
So if we serve Krᚣáša, that is our Acyuta position. If we deny to serve Krᚣáša, that is vicyuta, fallen condition. Acyuta and vicyuta. So to become Krᚣáša conscious means acyuta-gotra. Acyuta-gotra. Gotra, perhaps you do not know. Gotra is the family tradition. According to Vedic civilization, everybody has got gotra. Gotra means of the same family, of rᚣis, gotra, from the rᚣis. So we have to become acyuta-gotra, again belonging to the family of Krᚣáša. Now we are fallen. Therefore we have forgotten that we belong to the family of Krᚣáša. When we revive our consciousness, Krᚣáša consciousness, that "I belong to the Krᚣáša's family..." Krᚣáša is not alone, eko bahu syama. He wants to enjoy.
So we are family members of Krᚣáša, not void. That is another rascaldom. Why Krᚣáša should be alone? He is so powerful, He is so opulent, have you got any experience that a powerful person, opulent person is alone? Where is that example? Any rich man, any powerful man, any king, any lord, oh, he has got so many associates. So how Krᚣáša can be alone? Krᚣáša is never alone. Therefore you will find always Krᚣáša with the gopis, Krᚣáša with the cowherds boys, Krᚣáša with Arjuna. Krᚣáša is never alone. So these are the conditions of becoming acyuta. So Arjuna knows all these things because he is a devotee. Therefore particularly he is addressing Krᚣáša, senayor ubhayor madhye rathaáš sthapaya me acyuta [Bg. 1.21]. That's all right. Thank you very much. (end)
730719BG.LON