etÄá¹ sa ÄsthÄya parÄtma-niṣṭhÄm
adhyÄsitÄá¹ pÅ«rvatamair mahadbhiḥ
ahaá¹ tariá¹£yÄmi duranta-pÄraá¹
tamo mukundÄá¹…ghri-niá¹£evayaiva

1 times this text was mentioned in purports to other texts: SB(1)

 etÄm - this; saḥ - such; ÄsthÄya - being completely fixed in; para-Ätma-niṣṭhÄm - devotion to the Supreme Person, Kṛṣṇa; adhyÄsitÄm - worshiped; pÅ«rva-tamaiḥ - by previous; mahadbhiḥ - ÄcÄryas; aham - I; tariá¹£yÄmi - shall cross over; duranta-pÄram - the insurmountable; tamaḥ - the ocean of nescience; mukunda-aá¹…ghri - of the lotus feet of Mukunda; niá¹£evayÄ - by worship; eva - certainly.


Text

“[As a brÄhmaṇa from AvantÄ«-deÅ›a said:] ‘I shall cross over the insurmountable ocean of nescience by being firmly fixed in the service of the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa. This was approved by the previous ÄcÄryas, who were fixed in firm devotion to the Lord, ParamÄtmÄ, the Supreme Personality of Godhead.’ â€

Purport

In connection with this verse, which is a quotation from ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam (11.23.57), ÅšrÄ«la BhaktisiddhÄnta SarasvatÄ« ṬhÄkura says that of the sixty-four items required for rendering devotional service, acceptance of the symbolic marks of sannyÄsa is a regulative principle. If one accepts the sannyÄsa order, his main business is to devote his life completely to the service of Mukunda, Kṛṣṇa. If one does not completely devote his mind and body to the service of the Lord, he does not actually become a sannyÄsÄ«. It is not simply a matter of changing dress. In Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ (6.1) it is also stated, anÄÅ›ritaḥ karma-phalaá¹ kÄryaá¹ karma karoti yaḥ/ sa sannyÄsÄ« ca yogÄ« ca: one who works devotedly for the satisfaction of Kṛṣṇa is a sannyÄsÄ«. The dress is not sannyÄsa, but the attitude of service to Kṛṣṇa is.

The word parÄtma-niṣṭhÄ means being a devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa. ParÄtmÄ, the Supreme Person, is Kṛṣṇa. Īśvaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇaḥ sac-cid-Änanda-vigrahaḥ. Those who are completely dedicated to the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa in service are actually sannyÄsÄ«s. As a matter of formality, the devotee accepts the sannyÄsa dress as previous ÄcÄryas did. He also accepts the three daṇá¸as. Later Viṣṇu SvÄmÄ« considered that accepting the dress of a tri-daṇá¸Ä« was parÄtma-niṣṭhÄ. Therefore sincere devotees add another daṇá¸a, the jÄ«va-daṇá¸a, to the three existing daṇá¸as. The Vaiṣṇava sannyÄsÄ« is known as a tridaṇá¸i-sannyÄsÄ«. The MÄyÄvÄdÄ« sannyÄsÄ« accepts only one daṇá¸a, not understanding the meaning of tri-daṇá¸a. Later, many persons in the community of Åšiva SvÄmÄ« gave up the Ätma-niṣṭhÄ (devotional service) of the Lord and followed the path of Åšaá¹…karÄcÄrya. Instead of accepting 108 names, those in the Åšiva SvÄmÄ« sampradÄya follow the path of Åšaá¹…karÄcÄrya and accept the ten names of sannyÄsa. Although ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu accepted the then-existing order of sannyÄsa (namely eka-daṇá¸a), He still recited a verse from ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam about the tridaṇá¸a-sannyÄsa accepted by the brÄhmaṇa of AvantÄ«pura. Indirectly He declared that within that eka-daṇá¸a, one daṇá¸a, four daṇá¸as existed as one. Accepting ekadaṇá¸a-sannyÄsa without parÄtma-niṣṭhÄ (devotional service to Lord Kṛṣṇa) is not acceptable to ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu. In addition, according to the exact regulative principles, one should add the jÄ«va-daṇá¸a to the tri-daṇá¸a. These four daṇá¸as, bound together as one, are symbolic of unalloyed devotional service to the Lord. Because the ekadaṇá¸i-sannyÄsÄ«s of the MÄyÄvÄda school are not devoted to the service of Kṛṣṇa, they try to merge into the Brahman effulgence, which is a marginal position between material and spiritual existence. They accept this impersonal position as liberation. MÄyÄvÄdÄ« sannyÄsÄ«s, not knowing that ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu was a tridaṇá¸Ä«, think of Caitanya MahÄprabhu as an ekadaṇá¸i-sannyÄsÄ«. This is due to their vivarta, bewilderment. In ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam there is no such thing as an ekadaṇá¸i-sannyÄsÄ«; indeed, the tridaṇá¸i-sannyÄsÄ« is accepted as the symbolic representation of the sannyÄsa order. By citing this verse from ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam, ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu accepted the sannyÄsa order recommended in ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam. The MÄyÄvÄdÄ« sannyÄsÄ«s, who are enamored of the external energy of the Lord, cannot understand the mind of ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu.

To date, all the devotees of ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu, following in His footsteps, accept the sannyÄsa order and keep the sacred thread and tuft of unshaved hair. The ekadaṇá¸i-sannyÄsÄ«s of the MÄyÄvÄdÄ« school give up the sacred thread and do not keep any tuft of hair. Therefore they are unable to understand the purport of tridaṇá¸a-sannyÄsa, and as such they are not inclined to dedicate their lives to the service of Mukunda. They simply think of merging into the existence of Brahman because of their disgust with material existence. The ÄcÄryas who advocate the daiva-varṇÄÅ›rama (the social order of cÄtur-varṇyam mentioned in the Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ) do not accept the proposition of Äsura-varṇÄÅ›rama, which maintains that the social order of varṇa is indicated by birth.

The most intimate devotee of ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu, namely GadÄdhara Paṇá¸ita, accepted tridaṇá¸a-sannyÄsa and also accepted MÄdhava UpÄdhyÄya as his tridaṇá¸i-sannyÄsÄ« disciple. It is said that from this MÄdhavÄcÄrya the sampradÄya known in western India as the VallabhÄcÄrya sampradÄya has begun. ÅšrÄ«la GopÄla Bhaá¹­á¹­a GosvÄmÄ«, who is known as a smá¹›ty-ÄcÄrya in the Gauá¸Ä«ya-Vaiṣṇava-sampradÄya, later accepted the tridaṇá¸a-sannyÄsa order from Tridaṇá¸ipÄda PrabodhÄnanda SarasvatÄ«. Although acceptance of tridaṇá¸a-sannyÄsa is not distinctly mentioned in the Gauá¸Ä«ya Vaiṣṇava literature, the first verse of ÅšrÄ«la RÅ«pa GosvÄmī’s UpadeÅ›Ämá¹›ta advocates that one should accept the tridaṇá¸a-sannyÄsa order by controlling the six forces:

vÄco vegaá¹ manasaḥ krodha-vegaá¹
 jihvÄ-vegam udaropastha-vegam
etÄn vegÄn yo viá¹£aheta dhÄ«raḥ
 sarvÄm apÄ«mÄá¹ pá¹›thivÄ«á¹ sa Å›iá¹£yÄt

“One who can control the forces of speech, mind, anger, belly, tongue and genitals is known as a gosvÄmÄ« and is competent to accept disciples all over the world.†The followers of ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu never accepted the MÄyÄvÄda order of sannyÄsa, and for this they cannot be blamed. ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu accepted ÅšrÄ«dhara SvÄmÄ«, who was a tridaṇá¸i-sannyÄsÄ«, but the MÄyÄvÄdÄ« sannyÄsÄ«s, not understanding ÅšrÄ«dhara SvÄmÄ«, sometimes think that ÅšrÄ«dhara SvÄmÄ« belonged to the MÄyÄvÄda ekadaṇá¸a-sannyÄsa community. Actually this was not the case.