uá¹­haha, amogha, tumi lao kṛṣṇa-nÄma
acire tomÄre ká¹›pÄ karibe bhagavÄn

 uá¹­haha - get up; amogha - Amogha; tumi - you; lao - chant; kṛṣṇa-nÄma - the holy name of Lord Kṛṣṇa; acire - very soon; tomÄre - unto you; ká¹›pÄ - mercy; karibe - will bestow; bhagavÄn - the Supreme Personality of Godhead.


Text

“Therefore, Amogha, get up and chant the Hare Kṛṣṇa mahÄ-mantra! If you do so, Kṛṣṇa will unfailingly bestow mercy upon you.â€

Purport

The Absolute Truth is realized in three phases — impersonal Brahman, ParamÄtmÄ and the Supreme Personality of Godhead, BhagavÄn. All of these are one and the same truth, but Brahman, ParamÄtmÄ and BhagavÄn constitute three different features. Whoever understands Brahman is called a brÄhmaṇa, and when a brÄhmaṇa engages in the Lord’s devotional service, he is called a Vaiṣṇava. Unless one comes to understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead, his realization of impersonal Brahman is imperfect. A brÄhmaṇa can chant the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra on the platform of nÄmÄbhÄsa, but not on the platform of pure vibration. When a brÄhmaṇa engages in the Lord’s service, fully understanding his eternal relationship, his devotional service is called abhidheya. When one attains that stage, he is called a bhÄgavata, or Vaiṣṇava. This indicates that he is free from contamination and material attachment. Lord Kṛṣṇa confirms this in the Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ (7.28):

yeá¹£Äá¹ tv anta-gataá¹ pÄpaá¹ janÄnÄá¹ puṇya-karmaṇÄm
te dvandva-moha-nirmuktÄ bhajante mÄá¹ dá¹›á¸ha-vratÄḥ

“Persons who have acted piously in previous lives and in this life and whose sinful actions are completely eradicated are freed from the duality of delusion, and they engage themselves in My service with determination.â€

A brÄhmaṇa may be a very learned scholar, but this does not mean that he is free from material contamination. A brÄhmaṇa’s contamination, however, is in the mode of goodness. In the material world, the three modes are goodness, passion and ignorance, and all of these are simply different gradations of contamination. Unless a brÄhmaṇa transcends such contamination and approaches the platform of unalloyed devotional service, he cannot be accepted as a Vaiṣṇava. An impersonalist may be aware of the impersonal Brahman feature of the Absolute Truth, but his activities are on the impersonal platform. Sometimes he imagines a form of the Lord (saguṇa-upÄsanÄ), but such an attempt is never successful in helping one attain complete realization. The impersonalist may consider himself a brÄhmaṇa and may be situated in the mode of goodness, but nonetheless he is conditioned by one of the modes of material nature. This means that he is not yet liberated, for liberation cannot be attained unless one is completely free from the modes. In any case, the MÄyÄvÄda philosophy keeps one conditioned. If one becomes a Vaiṣṇava through proper initiation, he automatically becomes a brÄhmaṇa. There is no doubt about it. The Garuá¸a PurÄṇa confirms this:

brÄhmaṇÄnÄá¹ sahasrebhyaḥ satra-yÄjÄ« viÅ›iá¹£yate
satra-yÄji-sahasrebhyaḥ sarva-vedÄnta-pÄragaḥ
sarva-vedÄnta-vit-koá¹­yÄ viṣṇu-bhakto viÅ›iá¹£yate

“Out of many thousands of brÄhmaṇas, one may become qualified to perform yajña. Out of many thousands of such qualified brÄhmaṇas, one may be fully aware of the VedÄnta philosophy. Out of many millions of learned VedÄnta scholars, there may be one viṣṇu-bhakta, or devotee of Lord Viṣṇu. It is he who is most exalted.â€

Unless one is a fully qualified brÄhmaṇa, he cannot advance in the spiritual science. A real brÄhmaṇa is never envious of Vaiṣṇavas. If he is, he is considered an imperfect neophyte. Impersonalist brÄhmaṇas are always opposed to Vaiṣṇava principles. They are envious of Vaiṣṇavas because they do not know the goal of life. Na te viduḥ svÄrtha-gatiá¹ hi viṣṇum. However, when a brÄhmaṇa becomes a Vaiṣṇava, there is no duality. If a brÄhmaṇa does not become a Vaiṣṇava, he certainly falls down from the brÄhmaṇa platform. This is confirmed by ÅšrÄ«mad-BhÄgavatam (11.5.3): na bhajanty avajÄnanti sthÄnÄd bhraṣṭÄḥ patanty adhaḥ.

We can actually see that in this Age of Kali many so-called brÄhmaṇas are envious of Vaiṣṇavas. The Kali-contaminated brÄhmaṇas consider Deity worship to be imaginative: arcye viṣṇau Å›ilÄ-dhÄ«r guruá¹£u nara-matir vaiṣṇave jÄti-buddhiḥ. Such a contaminated brÄhmaṇa may superficially imagine a form of the Lord, but actually he considers the Deity in the temple to be made of stone or wood. Similarly, such a contaminated brÄhmaṇa considers the guru to be an ordinary human being, and he objects when a Vaiṣṇava is created by the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement. Many so-called brÄhmaṇas attempt to fight us, saying, “How can you create a brÄhmaṇa out of a European or American? A brÄhmaṇa can be born only in a brÄhmaṇa family.†They do not consider that this is never stated in any revealed scripture. Lord Kṛṣṇa specifically states in the Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ (4.13), cÄtur-varṇyaá¹ mayÄ sṛṣṭaá¹ guṇa-karma-vibhÄgaÅ›aḥ: “According to the three modes of material nature and the work associated with them, the four divisions of human society are created by Me.â€

Thus a brÄhmaṇa is not a result of the caste system. He becomes a brÄhmaṇa only by qualification. Similarly, a Vaiṣṇava does not belong to a particular caste; rather, his designation is determined by the rendering of devotional service.