Å›rÄ«-rÅ«pa, sanÄtana, bhaá¹á¹a raghunÄtha
Å›rÄ«-jÄ«va, gopÄla-bhaá¹á¹a, dÄsa-raghunÄtha
Å›rÄ«-rÅ«pa - ÅšrÄ«la RÅ«pa GosvÄmÄ«; sanÄtana - ÅšrÄ«la SanÄtana GosvÄmÄ«; bhaá¹á¹a raghunÄtha - RaghunÄtha Bhaá¹á¹a GosvÄmÄ«; Å›rÄ«-jÄ«va - ÅšrÄ« JÄ«va GosvÄmÄ«; gopÄla-bhaá¹á¹a - ÅšrÄ« GopÄla Bhaá¹á¹a GosvÄmÄ«; dÄsa-raghunÄtha - RaghunÄtha dÄsa GosvÄmÄ«.
I also remember the six GosvÄmÄ«s — RÅ«pa, SanÄtana, Bhaá¹á¹a RaghunÄtha, ÅšrÄ« JÄ«va, GopÄla Bhaá¹á¹a and DÄsa RaghunÄtha.
This is the process for writing transcendental literature. A sentimentalist who has no Vaiṣṇava qualifications cannot produce transcendental writings. There are many fools who consider kṛṣṇa-lÄ«lÄ to be a subject of art and who write or paint pictures about the pastimes of Lord Kṛṣṇa with the gopÄ«s, sometimes depicting them in a manner practically obscene. These fools take pleasure in material sense gratification, but one who wants to make advancement in spiritual life must scrupulously avoid their literature. Unless one is a servant of Kṛṣṇa and the Vaiṣṇavas, as KṛṣṇadÄsa KavirÄja GosvÄmÄ« presents himself to be in offering respects to Lord Caitanya, His associates and His disciples, one should not attempt to write transcendental literature.
