tabe nija bhakta kaila yata mleccha Ädi
sabe eá¸Äila mÄtra kÄśīra mÄyÄvÄdÄ«

 tabe - thereafter; nija - own; bhakta - devotee; kaila - converted; yata - all; mleccha - one who does not follow the Vedic principles; Ädi - heading the list; sabe - all those; eá¸Äila - escaped; mÄtra - only; kÄśīra - of VÄrÄṇasÄ«; mÄyÄvÄdÄ« - impersonalists.


Text

All were converted into devotees of Lord Caitanya, even the mlecchas and yavanas. Only the impersonalist followers of Åšaá¹…karÄcÄrya evaded Him.

Purport

In this verse it is clearly indicated that although Lord Caitanya MahÄprabhu converted Muslims and other mlecchas into devotees, the impersonalist followers of Åšaá¹…karÄcÄrya could not be converted. After accepting the renounced order of life, Caitanya MahÄprabhu converted many karma-niṣṭhas who were addicted to fruitive activities, many great logicians like SÄrvabhauma Bhaá¹­á¹­ÄcÄrya, nindakas (blasphemers) like PrakÄÅ›Änanda SarasvatÄ«, pÄá¹£aṇá¸Ä«s (nondevotees) like JagÄi and MÄdhÄi, and adhama paá¸uyÄs (degraded students) like Mukunda and his friends. All of them gradually became devotees of the Lord, even the PÄá¹­hÄns (Muslims), but the worst offenders, the impersonalists, were extremely difficult to convert, for they very tactfully escaped the devices of Lord Caitanya MahÄprabhu.

In describing the KÄśīra MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s, ÅšrÄ«la BhaktisiddhÄnta SarasvatÄ« ṬhÄkura has explained that persons who are bewildered by empiric knowledge or direct sensual perception, and who thus consider that even this limited material world can be gauged by their material estimations, conclude that anything that one can discern by direct sense perception is but mÄyÄ, or illusion. They maintain that although the Absolute Truth is beyond the range of sense perception, it includes no spiritual variety or enjoyment. According to the KÄśīra MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s, the spiritual world is simply void. They do not believe in the Personality of the Absolute Truth or in His varieties of activities in the spiritual world. Although they have their own arguments, which are not very strong, they have no conception of the variegated activities of the Absolute Truth. These impersonalists, who are followers of Åšaá¹…karÄcÄrya, are generally known as KÄśīra MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s (impersonalists residing in VÄrÄṇasÄ«).

Near VÄrÄṇasÄ« there is another group of impersonalists, who are known as SaranÄtha MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s. Outside the city of VÄrÄṇasÄ« is a place known as SaranÄtha, where there is a big Buddhist stÅ«pa. Many followers of Buddhist philosophy live there, and they are known as SaranÄtha MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s. The impersonalists of SaranÄtha differ from those of VÄrÄṇasÄ«, for the VÄrÄṇasÄ« impersonalists propagate the idea that the impersonal Brahman is truth whereas material varieties are false, but the SaranÄtha impersonalists do not even believe that the Absolute Truth, or Brahman, can be understood as the opposite of mÄyÄ, or illusion. According to their vision, materialism is the only manifestation of the Absolute Truth.

Factually both the KÄśīra and the SaranÄtha MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s, as well as any other philosophers who have no knowledge of the spirit soul, are advocates of utter materialism. None of them have clear knowledge regarding the Absolute or the spiritual world. Philosophers like the SaranÄtha MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s who do not believe in the spiritual existence of the Absolute Truth but consider material varieties to be everything do not believe that there are two kinds of nature, inferior (material) and superior (spiritual), as described in the Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ. Actually, neither the VÄrÄṇasÄ« nor SaranÄtha MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s accept the principles of the Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ, due to a poor fund of knowledge.

Since these impersonalists who do not have perfect spiritual knowledge cannot understand the principles of bhakti-yoga, they must be classified among the nondevotees who are against the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement. We sometimes feel inconvenienced by the hindrances offered by these impersonalists, but we do not care about their so-called philosophy, for we are propagating our own philosophy as presented in Bhagavad-gÄ«tÄ As It Is and getting successful results. Theorizing as if devotional service were subject to their mental speculation, both kinds of MÄyÄvÄdÄ« impersonalists conclude that the subject matter of bhakti-yoga is a creation of mÄyÄ and that Kṛṣṇa, devotional service and the devotee are also mÄyÄ. Therefore, as stated by ÅšrÄ« Caitanya MahÄprabhu, mÄyÄvÄdÄ« kṛṣṇe aparÄdhÄ«: “All the MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s are offenders to Lord Kṛṣṇa.†(Cc. Madhya 17.129) It is not possible for them to understand the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement; therefore we do not value their philosophical conclusions. However expert such quarrelsome impersonalists are in putting forward their so-called logic, we defeat them in every respect and go forward with our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement. Their imaginative mental speculation cannot deter the progress of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, which is completely spiritual and is never under the control of such MÄyÄvÄdÄ«s.