jagat á¸ubila, jÄ«vera haila bÄ«ja nÄÅ›a
tÄhÄ dekhi' pÄá¹…ca janera parama ullÄsa
jagat - the whole world; á¸ubila - drowned; jÄ«vera - of the living entities; haila - it so became; bÄ«ja - the seed; nÄÅ›a - completely finished; tÄhÄ - then; dekhi' - by seeing; pÄñca - five; janera - of the persons; parama - highest; ullÄsa - happiness.
In this connection, ÅšrÄ«la BhaktisiddhÄnta SarasvatÄ« ṬhÄkura writes in his AnubhÄá¹£ya that since the living entities all belong to the marginal potency of the Lord, each and every living entity has a natural tendency to become Kṛṣṇa conscious, although at the same time the seed of material enjoyment is undoubtedly within him. The seed of material enjoyment, watered by the course of material nature, fructifies to become a tree of material entanglement that endows the living entity with all kinds of material enjoyment. To enjoy such material facilities is to be afflicted with the three material miseries. However, when by nature’s law there is a flood, the seeds within the earth become inactive. Similarly, as the inundation of love of Godhead spreads all over the world, the seeds of material enjoyment become impotent. Thus the more the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement spreads, the more the desire for material enjoyment decreases. The seed of material enjoyment automatically becomes impotent with the increase of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement.
Instead of being envious that Kṛṣṇa consciousness is spreading all over the world by the grace of Lord Caitanya, those who are jealous should be happy, as indicated here by the words parama ullÄsa. But because they are kaniá¹£á¹ha-adhikÄrÄ«s or prÄká¹›ta-bhaktas (materialistic devotees who are not advanced in spiritual knowledge), they are envious instead of happy, and they try to find faults in the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement. Yet ÅšrÄ«mat PrabodhÄnanda SarasvatÄ« writes in his Caitanya-candrÄmá¹›ta that when influenced by Lord Caitanya’s Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, materialists become averse to talking about their wives and children, supposedly learned scholars give up their tedious studies of Vedic literature, yogÄ«s give up their impractical practices of mystic yoga, ascetics give up their austere activities of penance and austerity, and sannyÄsÄ«s give up their study of SÄá¹…khya philosophy. Thus they are all attracted by the bhakti-yoga practices of Lord Caitanya and cannot relish a mellow superior to that of Kṛṣṇa consciousness.